Share via Print Although the U.
We often forget that the products we use every day are potentially tested on animals. As for cosmetic testing, the potential reactions of animals could be completely unrelated to humans. The Humane Society says that even though animal testing is not required by law like it is in Chinacompanies still choose to use it.
The animals most frequently used are mice, rats, rabbits and guinea pigs. In these tests for cosmetic products, they suffer through evaluations for skin irritation, eye irritation and any kind of toxicity. This in turn can cause severe damage to the animal, or worse—death. Unfortunately, these animals are often not protected under the Animal Welfare Act.
Again, animal testing can be pointless because, according to the Human Society, "different species can respond differently when exposed to the same chemicals. Animal testing is simply unnecessary.
This doesn't mean that we should instead put humans in danger. A solution to animal testing is for companies to use products that are already deemed safe. There are tons of ingredients that have already been confirmed as safe for human skin.
They have been used for years and were tested in the past. This means they do not require more testing, putting an end to animal testing, which is how so many companies remain cruelty-free. According to PETA, an alternative to animal testing that companies use is to use cornea-like 3D structures, which are produced from human cells.
These human skin cultures can be grown and purchased specifically for cosmetic testing. Humane Society International estimates that ,—, animals suffer and die every year due to cosmetic testing. In these tests, the animals have chemicals forced down their throats, into their eyes and onto their shaved skin in order to document their reaction to ensure the safe use for humans.
These tests determine if these products cause general illness or health hazards like cancer or birth defects.
They also conduct lethal dose tests, where the animals are forced to swallow large amounts of a test chemical to see what dose can cause death. These tests can result in immense pain, distress, blindness, swollen eyes, sore and bleeding skin, internal bleeding, organ damage, birth defects, convulsions and even death in the animals.
However, there are scientists who back animal testing for cosmetics. Animal testing obviously reduces suffering for humans, which scientists feel is most important. There is also the argument that veterinary research relies on animal testing. Animal testing has also contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments.
But the fact remains, cosmetic testing is still seen as extremely inhumane and unnecessary. As of April of this year, there are many companies who still test on animals. Cosmetic companies based in the UK are typically cruelty-free, as cosmetic testing is banned there.
To ensure an absolute cruelty-free cosmetics collection, always look out for the signature cruelty-free bunny logo. Makeup Companies Who tests:Why mice are being gassed so YOU can look younger - 1/ Torturing Animals for Fractured Science - January Animal Testing Alternatives - Links to Sources - March Animal On the various ways in which rats are exploited and tortured and how she has acted to mitigate their suffering.
Monkey Boiled Alive in Everett, Wa Research. Animal testing has played an integral role in the scientific method for thousands of years.
Today, animals are still widely used for research purposes and the use of animal models during preclinical trials is an important step in the path to drug development. The U.S. has many resources committed to researching alternatives to animal testing. The Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) at Johns Hopkins is at the forefront of the science, and.
From a medical standpoint, many alternatives prove promising, but can the use of animals in testing ever be completely eliminated? The purpose of this page is to explore all of the different angles of the animal testing issue and evaluate whether or not animals are necessary in the research process.
There are already many alternatives to animals which have been developed, particularly in the areas of toxicity testing and teaching. Developments have occurred most rapidly and effectively in countries in which the use of animals is prohibited.
The US National Academy of Sciences released a report in envisioning a future in which animals would largely disappear from toxicity testing programs. The report, drafted by a panel of experts, proposed that toxicity induced by drugs, food additives, pesticides, and other chemicals be assessed.