Martin, but I am hoping that this will get back to him. I am going to respond to some of the things Mr.
Links Your browser does not support iframes. This essay was published in February ofin the following context: The Supreme Court had declared in Bowers v.
I was also writing this essay to a conservative Mormon audience that at the time would have felt no interest in decriminalizing homosexual acts. In that context, my call to "leave the laws on the books" was simply recognizing the law at that time, and my call to not enforce it except in flagrant cases was actually, within that context, a liberal and tolerant view -- for which I was roundly criticized in conservative Mormon circles as being "pro-gay.
That is absurd -- now that the law has changed the decision was overturned in I have no interest in criminalizing homosexual acts and would never call for such a thing, any more than I wanted such laws enforced back when they were still on the books.
But I stand by the main points of this essay, which concerns matters internal to the Mormon Church. This article is offered to Internet users free of charge under the following conditions: The Hypocrites of Homosexuality By Orson Scott Card from Sunstone magazine When I was an undergraduate theatre student, I was aware, and not happily so, how pervasive was the reach of the underculture of homosexuality among my friends and acquaintances.
After a while I stopped being shocked to discover that someone I had known well, or whose talent I admired, was either moving into or already a part of the not-so-clandestine network of gay relationships.
I did learn that for most of them their highest allegiance was to their membership in the community that gave them access to sex. One thing is certain: The LDS church is one such community. The homosexual community seems to be another.
And when I read the statements of those who claim to be both LDS and homosexual, trying to persuade the former community to cease making their membership contingent upon abandoning the latter, I wonder if they realize that the price of such "tolerance" would be, in the long run, the destruction of the Church.
We Latter-day Saints know that we are eternal beings who must gain control of our bodies and direct our lives toward the good of others in order to be worthy of an adult role in the hereafter.
So the regulation of sexual drives is designated not just to preserve the community of the Saints but also to improve and educate the individuals within it.
The Lord asks no more of its members who are tempted toward homosexuality than it does of its unmarried adolescents, its widows and widowers, its divorced members, and its members who never marry.
Furthermore, the Lord even guides the sexual behavior of those who are married, expecting them to use their sexual powers responsibly and in a proportionate role within the marriage.
The argument by the hypocrites of homosexuality that homosexual tendencies are genetically ingrained in some individuals is almost laughably irrelevant. We are all genetically predisposed toward some sin or another; we are all expected to control those genetic predispositions when it is possible.
It is for God to judge which individuals are tempted beyond their ability to bear or beyond their ability to resist. But it is the responsibility of the Church and the Saints never to lose sight of the goal of perfect obedience to laws designed for our happiness.
The average fifteen-year-old teenage boy is genetically predisposed to copulate with anything that moves. We are compassionate and forgiving of those who cannot resist this temptation, but we do not regard as adult anyone who has not overcome it; and we can only help others overcome those "genetic predispositions" by teaching them that we expect them to meet a higher standard of behavior than the one their own body teaches them.
Are we somehow cruel and overdomineering when we teach young men and young women that their lives will be better and happier if they have no memory of sexual intercourse with others to deal with when they finally are married? On the contrary, we would be heartless and cruel if we did not.
The hypocrites of homosexuality are, of course, already preparing to answer these statements by accusing me of homophobia, gay-bashing, bigotry, intolerance; but nothing that I have said here -- and nothing that has been said by any of the prophets or any of the Church leaders who have dealt with this issue -- can be construed as advocating, encouraging, or even allowing harsh personal treatment of individuals who are unable to resist the temptation to have sexual relations with persons of the same sex.
On the contrary, the teachings of the Lord are clear in regard to the way we must deal with sinners.The Ender’s Game movie premieres today, nearly 30 years after Orson Scott Card’s science fiction classic was published. The film, in development for almost half that time, does not lack star power.
The story is about a dystopian future in which pubescent boys and girls are recruited to lead. Now Orson Scott Card, author of the iconic source novel which forms the basis of upcoming sci-fi blockbuster Ender's Game, has repeated the trick, and imagined a post-democratic USA in which the.
is and in to a was not you i of it the be he his but for are this that by on at they with which she or from had we will have an what been one if would who has her.
USA Today: If only Romney's supporters would act more like Mormon missionaries, the bias against Mitt would melt away. Mormon-owned Deseret News: Robert P. George is . Written in , Orson Scott Card’s novel Ender’s Game was a young adult novel before the term became fashionable, a stirring tale of future war in which a plucky tween overcomes brutal adult.
When one of the most successful authors on the planet takes the time to talk about something you did, I figure that deserves an in depth response.